mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Our salon's first encounter with the Fritz/MT ship came when [personal profile] selenak reported on a miniseries about MT:

The Maria Theresia two parter early on has a not very historical case of Prince Eugen & Grumpkow scheming to to get those crazy kids - her and Fritz - together in a marriage alliance, difference of religion be damned, thereby solving the succession troubles, and young teenage MT basically is all "You want me to marry into that insane family with all the abuse? Thanks but no thanks, I'm marrying Franzl!"

But then, [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard ran across a historical case of this ship in MacDonogh!

Fritz proposes the idea seriously )

Of course, the difference is that this was Fritz's idea, and Eugene and Seckendorf were very "WTF no" about it. We later turned up the primary source for this, in Förster's collection of correspondence:

Förster documentation )

More primary sources in the form of letters from Fritz to Grumbkow even after he was released from Kustrin, trying to get married to MT instead of EC:

Letters to Grumbkow )

And then we turned up a not very reliable historical figure crediting FW with the idea:

Thiebault )

18th century authors with a dog in the fight and no access to the archives debate over whether Fritz would or would not:

Pastor Muller's son says Fritz would NEVER! )

Zimmermann, in contrast, writing in 1790, not only thinks Fritz would but thinks Fritz *did*--at least in terms of attempting to escape in 1730 so he could marry MT.

Zimmermann says Fritz WOULD TOO! )

But wait! Not only do we know Fritz would because of the 1731-1732 letters, but he even had the idea well before Kustrin. In 1730, Fritz told Katte he needed to escape because Seckendorff and Grumbkow were plotting to marry him to an Austrian archduchess and force him to convert to Catholicism.

1730 plot )

Then we turned up the primary source for Koser's claim, which turned out to be Hinrich's collection of the 1730 documents pertaining to the escape attempt.

Hinrichs documentation )

Remember when Nicolai was interviewing Muller's son about the alleged marriage plan? He writes a response to Zimmermann's claim that Fritz tried to escape in order to marry MT.

Nicolai makes mincemeat of Zimmermann's theory )

But even this isn't the earliest attestation of this idea. For [personal profile] selenak reported this, in her write-up on Arneth's biography of Eugene:

1729 politicking )

Finally, it's spread out over many comments so I'm not going to reproduce it here, but you can read our speculations in 2019 about the "what-if" of Fritz and MT marrying and how that might have played out: https://cahn.dreamwidth.org/160700.html?thread=1118140#cmt1118140.

Based on new information acquired since these discussions took place, [personal profile] selenak had more commentary to add.

Related rumors )
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
The War of the Spanish Succession: Why do we care?

The generation prior to ours was deeply involved: F1, FW, MT's dad Charles VI, Hans Heinrich von Katte, Grumbkow, Prince Eugene, George I, Louis XIV, etc. Lots of royals died and new ones inherited, leading to tons of exciting political developments. It had as much to do with "Everyone in Europe is unhappy with everyone else" as it did with the actual Spanish Succession. It changed the map of Europe. New wars were started afterward by the people unhappy with the way this one ended.

It intersects in interesting ways with the Great Northern War, which was going on simultaneously, and about which I hope to learn more next.

Finally: all of Europe spent 40 years anticipating this war, making treaties to try to prevent it, and fighting other wars with an eye toward how this one was going to develop.

Overview )

Philip V )

Hanovers and Stuarts )

Netherlands backstory )

Royal Turnover 1711-1715 )

Battle of Blenheim )

1709 and Malplaquet )

Malplaquet tactics )

French, Dutch, and Bavarian Backstories )

Preventative Treaties That Prevent Nothing )

Some anecdotes )

Philip V: The Later Years )

For more backstory from the 15th-17th centuries, see [personal profile] selenak's various posts in this thread.
selenak: (James Boswell)
[personal profile] selenak
If you're new to the Frederician era and have at best read one biography or two, then congratulations if you remember the name Jacob Paul (von) Gundling at all. If you do, chances are that you've read a sentence or two claiming he was the court fool under Friedrich Wilhelm I., and was made head of the Academy of Sciences by him and thus was the symbol of in how low regard FW held the sciences. (If this comes up at all in Fritz biographies, it usually does when the author explains how the restructuring and refunding of the Academy in the Frederick the Great era was a symbol of the rebirth of Enlightenment and culture in Prussia.) While all of this is technically correct, it describes who Gundling was and what was done to him by Friedrich Wilhelm about as accurately as if I were to describe our antihero Frederick as "a maladjusted flute player who had a subsequent military career" . In fact, despite the huuuuge competition in the field, Gundling has a good head start in the race of being the most mistreated victim of the Soldier King. How so? Let me review a novel, a film and a non-fiction biography to explain.

The novel: Intellect vs Absolute Power, or: How a Scholar becomes a Fool )

The movie: In which Götz George and Wolfgang Kieling are brilliant )

Screencaps supporting this claim )

The biography: in which Martin Sabrow traces down Gundling's real life )

The funeral: The Contemporary Acccount )

In conclusion: a completely harrowing tale, and infuriating in that for such a long time, it was written off as mildly embarrassing to FW at best, not as the testimony to cruelty it is.
selenak: (Wilhelmine)
[personal profile] selenak
This is the tv version of a 19th century play; the original title of the play was “Zopf und Schwert”, “Tail and Sword”, the title of the tv movie is is “The Prussian Marriage”, “Die Preußische Heirat”. There are several interesting things about it, to which historical fidelity definitely doesn’t belong. The director was the great Helmut Käutner, who is responsible for several deserved German classics, some of the best 20th century German movies; I can only assume he was short of cash and needed the money in this case. The playwright was Karl Gutzkow, who was one of the rebellious 19th century Prussian folk ending up in exile. He had a very strict ultra religious Prussian Dad and a nervous breakdown from which he recuperated in Bayreuth, so I could see how he would empathize with Wilhelmine. Unfortunately, his empathy doesn’t express itself by writing her as a character with traits beyond “ingenue love interest”. And the story itself is, err, basically the Disney movie we joked about. Here’s a summary for you. Excuse the occasional Terminator jokes, but I couldn’t resist.

Read more... )
selenak: (Arvin Sloane by Perfectday)
[personal profile] selenak
"Der Mäzen der Aufklärung: Ernst Christoph von Manteuffel und das Netzwerk des Wolffianismus" was Johannes Bronisch's doctoral thesis and reads like it - aimed at a strictly academic audience, long footnotes at times taking most of the page space etc - , while "Der Kampf um Kronprinz Friedrich: Wolff gegen Voltaire" is basically a canny Fritz-focused digested excerpt from it, repacked for a larger audience (though it's still clearly not for newbies who know nothing of the 18th century). Before I get into details, let me add what his dissertation is not, and doesn't claim to be: a biography of Manteuffel. The emphasis here is strictly on him in the context of his philosophical and literary networking from 1730 onwards (why 1730? Not for the reason you think), with his entire decades long life and career before that only summarized. This frustrated me a little, as I'd hoped for more of a complete life, but that's on me, the key is in the title(s), and also, I do know more about Manteuffel even before 1730 than I used to through the summarzing. (Also, courtesy of the footnotes, I know there is an early 20th century Manteuffel biography: Thea von Seydewitz: Ernst Christoph Graf von Manteuffel, Kabinettsminister Augusts des Starken. Persönlichkeit und Wirken (Aus Sachsens Vergangenheit 5), Dresden 1926, which Bronisch by and large approves of for its research but chides for its emphasis (on Manteuffel the politician) which he seeks to rectify by presenting Manteuffel the enlightenment networker and cultural beacon, though inevitably there are politics involved there, too.) (See other title.) Another thing: Bronish praises older Fritzian historians like Koser and Droysen for their never again matched knowledge of primary sources as well me might, but that also means he relies on them for the Prussian side of things, which means the occasional blip like poor Gundling still showing up as the court fool made head of the academy.

Sir not appearing in either volume at all (seriously, no single mention, not even in the footnotes): Suhm. Seriously, Bronisch not only apparently had zero interest in the other Saxon envoy but doesn't think he's a factor in any way in his subject. (The titular fight from the canny repackage is carried out by French envoy La Chetardie and Voltaire as the main opponents to Manteuffel and Wolff.)


Okay, on to Mantteuffel, or, as the Imperial Secret Service with their idea of discretion codenamed him: Le Diable.

He's a man of wealth and taste: Rise of a Sugar Daddy )

Enter Voltaire, followed by Pyrrhic victory for Wolff )

The aftermath )
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Author: [personal profile] selenak
Original discussion: https://cahn.dreamwidth.org/183223.html?thread=3138999#cmt3138999
Relevant background info: https://rheinsberg.dreamwidth.org/36463.html, https://rheinsberg.dreamwidth.org/35210.html, https://rheinsberg.dreamwidth.org/46114.html

[personal profile] selenak: Here are some more ideas for unsent letters, both serious and cracky: G2's challenging FW to personal combat, and FW's equally unsent and/or confiscated reply;

[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard: I also admit that the G2-FW exchange especially jumps out at me as something that has the potential to be amaaaaaazing. Would read! Would so read!

[personal profile] selenak: You would, would you? Well....

🧔🏻 George II, King of England, Prince Elector of Hannover
🧟‍♂️ Friedrich Wilhelm, King in Prussia
👩🏼‍🦱 Caroline of Ansbach, Queen of England
🧟‍♀️ Sophia Dorothea of Hannover, Queen in Prussia
🍾 Grumbkow, advisor to FW
🧑🏻‍🎤 Lord Hervey, Caroline’s Chamberlain

🧔🏻: 🇬🇧 👑😎👅
🧟‍♂️: 💂🏻‍♀️💂💂🏻‍♂️👅
🧔🏻: 😤
🧟‍♂️: 🦅💯🇬🇧 💩
🧔🏻: 🤬 📩⚔️❗️
👩🏼‍🦱 🧟‍♀️: ❓⁉️
🧟‍♂️: ❗️💪🏻 📩
🍾: 🤯
🧑🏻‍🎤: 🇩🇪 🔛🤮
🧟‍♀️: 👑 👶🏻🤩
👩🏼‍🦱: 👑 👶🏻 😡
🍾: 🤔💂🏻‍♂️🐖🏹🍺💝
🧑🏻‍🎤: 😏 🙌🏻
👩🏼‍🦱: 💋🫕 🎻
🧟‍♂️: 😴
🧔🏻: 😴
👩🏼‍🦱 🍾 🧑🏻‍🎤: 👍
🧟‍♀️: 😒
selenak: (Sanssouci)
[personal profile] selenak
Thanks to [personal profile] prinzsorgenfrei, I watched the musical Friedrich: Mythos und Tragödie, of which I previously knew some of the songs - the ones which are up at YouTube - but not all, and had read a summary in German.

A spoilery review for the musical ensues )

A second review of this musical by the musical far more astute than I [personal profile] cahn:

...why is Katte here? )
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
Author: [personal profile] selenak
Original discussion: https://cahn.dreamwidth.org/168804.html?thread=2114660#cmt2114660

[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard's prompt: Fritz, Wilhelmine, and Katte all successfully escape to Count Rottembourg's estate. Man, FW is going to be So. Mad. Does he actually invade Alsace?

selenak's ficlet )
selenak: (Obsession by Eirena)
[personal profile] selenak
In August 1731, one year after Friedrich's failed attempt to escape, three quarters of a year after Katte's death, father and son saw each other again for the first time in twelve months. Friedrich Wilhelm expected, and received, an act of complete submission by his son, followed by a public reconciliation between the two of them. (This was, however, not the end of Friedrich's time in Küstrin; the conditions became less severe, but his state of gilded arrest did not end for good until he agreed to marry his father's choice, Elisabeth Christine, the subsequent year.)

Directly after the submission had taken place, Grumbkow, who had been present, wrote a description for his ally, the Imperial envoy Seckendorff.

Language observation: Grumbkow writes in German, and an old fashioned, more baroque than roccoco German at that. Sometimes he renders FW's statements in direct speech, sometimes indirectly. I do find it intriguing that FW keeps switching between "Du" and the two more formal adresses - the third person singular "Er" or the second person "Ihr" - when adressing Fritz, sometimes even within the same sentence, which tells you something about his volatile mood. Sadly, there's no way I can reproduce this in English. The protocol states:

Listen, my boy, and if you were 60 or 70 years old, you won't tell me what to do! )
selenak: (CourtierLehndorff)
[personal profile] selenak
Going through the various letters and documents found in the appendices of various 19th century biographers - Preuss, Förster et al - has produced a great many interesting and character-illuminating quotes, several of which are to be found in the letters exchanged between Crown Prince Friedrich and Grumbkow. (To recapitulate: Grumbkow was a minister of war (and other departments) in FW's cabinet, as close a friend as FW ever had, ally to Imperial envoy Seckendorff, enemy to Queen Sophia Dorothea. Pre 1730, he contributed his share to the increasingly toxic situation between FW and his son, mostly due to representing Imperial interests against British interests as pushed by Sophia Dorothea. However, Grumbkow was also a pragmatist who saw young Fritz as still the best candidate for the succession, and starting with running interference between father and son during the Küstrin year started to cultivate Fritz politically and socially. Whether he'd have fared as badly as Seckendorff would under the rule of Friedrich II, we'll never know; he died in 1739. Fritz, in a private letter to Wilhelmine, was entirely unmoved, if not somewhat delighted. Theirs had been an entirely pragmatic "let's be mutually useful to each other" relationship, mutual assurances of affection not withstanding. One early document, from the August of 1731, has Grumbkow providing guidelines for Friedrich's future behaviour which Fritz seems to have listened to. Not that he had much choice; this was the month in which FW visited Küstrin, father and son saw each other again for the first time in a year, and Fritz made his official submission to his father, complete with literally kissing his feet, plea of forgiveness and promise to do whatever his father wanted in the future.

You and your sister need some boundaries )

After looking in vain for a post-Küstrin Katte mention in letters from Fritz to people he actually cared for - Suhm, Algarotti, Wilhelmine, or, for that matter, Voltaire - , it was not a little startling to find a Katte reference by Fritz in a letter to Grumbkow, this one. The letter is dated October 29th, 1737. Context: FW seems to have shown dislike towards Mantteuffel, Saxon envoy, patron of Wolff the philosopher who is much resented by FW (though this will later change), part time Austrian spy instructed to get close to Fritz. Fritz in 1737 withdraws from Mantteuffel and writes to Dad's good friend Grumbkow:

I cannot be accused of cowardice )


Lastly, one more quote from a letter by Fritz to Grumbkow. It's the one right after the letter with the Katte reference, here, dated 1st November 1737. As far as both a pointed and shivery image for his relationship with his father goes, it can't be bettered, and it also contains more than a hint of future Friedrich II:

You were kind enough to come to my defense when the King talked about me. An artist never had as bad an opinion of his own creation as the King has of me. If this is artistic modesty, I must admit I find it goes a bit too far. I'd rather believe it's an old prejudice he's always had against me and which is too deeply rooted for him to abandon in age which makes him judge my character so badly. Who is to say one can't go to war against France just because one loves the good writers who have written in French and loves the witty and polite people this nation has produced?

Profile

rheinsberg: (Default)
rheinsberg

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 06:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios