selenak: (CourtierLehndorff)
[personal profile] selenak
First of all, authorship to this book is credit to the Earl of Ilchester and Mrs. Langford-Brooke, which I took to meaning the Earl provided a great many of the papers and Mrs. L-B did the actual writing. The preface details the convoluted fate of H-W's papers, and how, among other events, earlier attempts to write is biography or publish a collection of his poetry failed, the later because Southey, the poet entrusted with the task, flat out refused because of changed morality. To which I say: Southey, you had it coming. Partly because of this, I presume, our author(s) are at pains to emphasize how Sir Charles Hanbury-Williams was a man of his time, alright, but not really a coarse Georgian, and would that he had lived in better times. Hence no syphilis, no non-straight verses (though his insinuating comments on Fritz and Hervey are kept intact), and of the het verses, nothing explicit.

This said, it's a biography that uses a lot of primary material - not just Hanbury's own papers but the national archives (which for example the mid 19th century Mitchell editor and publisher Andrew Bisset also used) for all the diplomatic dispatches, and in this regard, it's a treasure trove. Most of the footnotes go to primary sources. On the downside, it doesn't feel like the author(s) consulted many non-British sources - I mainly noticed Poniatowski's and Catherine's memoirs -, but not much else, and nothing German, despite H-W's work in Dresden, Berlin, Vienna, and of course all the Hannover stuff. And even of the British contemporaries, non-complimentary takes on H-W are dismissed in footnotes or in the final chapter with two sentences, like when we're told Lady Mary Wortley-Montagu didn't have a high opinion of him, but as she was friends with his wife, she wouldn't have. (Love the argument, as opposed to "she was on the other side of a feud you even quoted a poem of his from, wherein not only Hervey but she get direclty attacked, and oh, yes, she was friends with Hervey much more intensely - the Algarotti triangle not withstanding - than she was with his wife.) It very much feels like an authorized biography written centuries after the fact.

Charles Hanbury-Williams: Youth and Soulmate )


Back to the 1920s hagioraphy: At any event, Wimmington's death is what ultimately pushes H-W into his envoy career later. But first Charles is a young man about town, and our authors are at pains to emphasize he was NOT a member of the Hellfire Club and did not participate in its orgies, he was a member of the Society of Dilettanti, which was a slightly more respectable frat boy union and future office holder network. He falls in love with Peg Woffington, the great actress of the day, but while accepting his suit she's also lovers with David Garrick, most famous actor of the day, and this leads to the anecdote where a jealous H-W accuses her of having seen Garrick only this morning, when she told him she hadn't seen Garrick for eons. Replies Peg: "And is not that an age ago?"

We've now reached the early 1740s, and the contortion of "don't say syphilis!" re: H-W's impending marital breakup is so great that I must quote:

The Illness that Dare Not Speak Its Name )

Simultanously to having his marriage explode, H-W bitches with the Foxes about Hervey.

We hates him, Precious! )

Charles Hanbury Williams gets into politics )

Execution of two Jacobite Lords )

First Posting: Anglo Among Saxons )

Second Posting: Meet the Hohenzollerns )

Interlude: The Mystery of Madame Brandt )

Back to H-W's Prussian adventures.

Avoiding Jacobite Exiles, Meeting Voltaire, Still Not Meeting Fritz )

Wilhelmine visits, and thus we get a H-W written portrait of her:

I never met with a woman so learnedly ignorant )

And now for the big letterly explosion. Our biographer tells us this rant on why Fritz sucks, sucks, sucks, is so "outspoken as to be partly unpublishable", because clearly he agrees with Georg Schnath on the tender sensibilities of 1920s readers. Still, what we get is:

The completest Tyrant that God ever sent for a scourge )

Fatherly Advice Interlude )


After a brief second Saxon interlude, H-W gets posted to Vienna because London is under the impression the current envoy, Robert Keith, isn't tough enough on MT. As mentioned elsewhere, H-W was that rarity, an envoy who succeeded in making himself unpopular in Vienna and Berlin to the same degree. As with Fritz, he came with an already formed opinion, slightly revised it upon being received by FS & MT (as opposed to Fritz, they received him quickly), and then went back into critique.

Charles Hanbury-Williams Tells It All: Habsburg Edition )

So no, that diplomatic posting isn't a roaring success, either. Exit Charles Hanbury-Williams. Russia awaits!

Russian Prelude, more fatherly advice )

Meeting Catherine The Not Yet Great: Diplomatic Success at Last! )

Corresponding With Catherine )

Saying goodbye to Poniatowski and Catherine )

H-W's journey back is described including a mental breakdown in Hamburg. Again, no mention of syphilis. Instead, we leanr that vulnerable Sir Charles manages to attract an enterprising adventuress named Julie John or Johnes who manages, after three days of acquaintance, to extract a marriage pledge and a grant of 10,000 roobles. She will actually show up in England later waving the marriage pledge at his family and will have to be paid off. Says the book: Whether from noxious drugs or from more natural causes, Sir Charles became completely deranged during those days in Hamburg.

Aaand he's off, with another member of the Marwitz clan as escort. He's not locked up in the proverbial attic in England but cared for in a nice house, and his daughters visit, which he reports in a short letter showing he can pull himself together that much. But basically, it's the end for Charles Hanbury-Williams.

Charles Hanbury-Williams: The Rebuttal )
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
The name of Peter Keith's younger brother, the page who betrayed the escape attempt in 1730, is unknown. Wikipedia and Giles MacDonogh's biography of Fritz refer to him as Robert Keith, thus leading us initially in salon to refer to him that way.

Then we found Kloosterhuis saying the name was not known, and we started referring to him as not!Robert.

After three years, I finally figured out where the name "Robert" came from!

Turns out it originates with a misunderstanding on MacDonogh's part, and MacDonogh is of course heavily used by Wikipedia, which has caused the misinformation to spread.

MacDonogh's source is the Neue Deutsche Biographie, the entry on James Keith. It says that James Keith was from a Scottish family, an earlier side-line of which had already furnished members to Prussian service, such as Robert Keith, adjutant of Fritz, and Peter Keith.

MacDonogh clearly took that to mean that Robert was Peter's brother the page, when Robert was unrelated/not closely related to Peter Keith.

Further investigation revealed that Robert Keith and James+George Keith were both descended from William Keith, 6th Earl Marischal, 1st Baronet (c. 1585 – 1635). Robert Keith, who married one of Suhm's daughters, was the 5th Baronet of Ludquharn. George Keith was the 10th Earl Marischal. So they were probably like second or third cousins.

I have never been able to figure out how exactly Peter's line fits into this, even with the genealogy Formey gives. I've only found a mutual relative descended from the 4th Earl Marischal, but all Formey will say is that he was a "relative" of Peter's line.

What I know from Formey is this:

  • The first mentioned ancestor is a 16th century George Keith who lived in Scotland, was a colonel, and married a woman from the house of Stewart/Stuart.

  • George's son, William Keith, left Scotland in 1606 at the age of 19 and went into Swedish service, where he became a captain of cavalry. He was related somehow to this much more famous Keith in Swedish service, Andrew Keith, Lord Dingwall.

  • William's son George was a lieutenant in the Swedish guard.

  • His son Jean Christophle/Hans Christoph established himself in Pomerania (then part of Sweden), and married Vigilantia Elisabeth von Woedtke, of the house of Sydow. He died in 1729, she died in 1747.

  • The son of Hans Christoph and Vigilantia Elisabeth is our Peter, 1711-1756.

The alternating Williams and Georges exactly matches the naming practices of the Marischals, but that paradoxically makes it harder, because if you find a William or George of that line in the 16th century, he's the heir, and so not Peter's more obscure ancestor.

Other than the naming problem, the problem is that these Keiths went to Sweden, so they tend not to show up in Scottish documents. In books titled "Scots in Sweden" (of which I've found 2 so far), there's a lot of Andrew Keith, Lord Dingwall, but not a lot of details on other Keiths. One of the books says, "There are many Keiths in Swedish history," and gives examples of a John, an Alexander, and a James (not our James), but that's not helping here!

If anyone runs across any 17th century William or George Keiths in Swedish service, let me know!
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)
[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
It all started when [personal profile] selenak talked about Charles II's escape from England during the English Civil War.

Charles II )

That led to a comparative discussion of royal escapes:

Salon discusses )

Which in turn led [personal profile] mildred_of_midgard to talk about the '45 in very general terms, focusing on Bonnie Prince Charlie's escape from Scotland in 1746:

Escape )

And a bit of backstory to the Jacobites:

Short backstory )
mildred_of_midgard: Frederick the Great statue (Frederick)
[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
In 1842, Macaulay was working on his History of England, a monumental five-volume work that he would publish a few years later. In the process of researching English history, he apparently ran across enough Fritz to become fascinated and decided he needed to write a short bio to get Fritz out of his system. To his editor, he wrote:

[Fritz's] personal character, manners, studies, literary associates; his quarrel with Voltaire, his friendship for Maupertuis, and his own unhappy métromanie will be will be very slightly, if at all alluded to in a History of England. Yet in order to write the History of England, it will be necessary to turn over all the Memoirs, and the writings of Frederic, connected with us, as he was, in a most important war.

This despite the fact that his history as published doesn't even overlap with Fritz's lifetime. Fritz is just that fascinating! (He really is. :P)

So Macaulay put together a 100-page bio that got reprinted a lot in the 19th and early 20th centuries. It stops with the end of the Seven Years' War, meaning Macaulay explicitly did what many people tacitly do, ignore the second 23 years of a 46-year reign. Carlyle's bio manages 20 books about the first 23 years (1740-1763) and 1 book about the second 23 (1763-1786).

The copy I obtained from Google Books, published in 1882, has a description of the second half of the reign supplied by someone with less amazing prose and wit than Macaulay. When Macaulay's essay comes to an end and the book continues, the editor puts in a footnote:

The reader will not need to be reminded that the narrative of Macaulay ends here. The descent from the sunny uplands of his style is sudden and painful, but there is no help for it. Herr Kohlrausch goes on honestly enough, and we must let him finish the story or go without it altogether. Patience; it will soon be over, and as a sugar-plum for good children, we promise you near the close a gorgeous picture of the great king in his old age, by Carlyle.

I cannot say I disagree: the post-Seven Years' War material by Herr Kohlrausch is unremarkable. But I give you, in a series of thematically grouped subthreads, Macaulay's most quotable moments. I wouldn't read this for facts or opinions, but you can tell this is the author of the Lays of Ancient Rome: very ringing and memorable prose, often quoted by modern biographers (even if only to disagree with the sentiments expressed).

Oh, apparently Macaulay called Carlyle's style gibberish when he started reading Carlyle's multi-volume Fritz bio in 1858, and I agree wholeheartedly. Humorously quotable in small excerpts; I've never managed to penetrate it as a work.

Oh, one very important thing to keep in mind from this, apart from Macaulay's political opinions and lack of access to the sources we now have: he was a nineteenth century British minister, and his biases are way showing. Do not take this write-up as a source for facts or interpretations of Fritz's life: it tells you far more about Macaulay than about Fritz. I've written it up at such length because Macaulay has an amazing writing style, not because this is a valuable historical source.

But on to the entertaining parts!

FW )

Voltaire )

MT )

Fritzian friends and family )

Fritz as poet )

Fritz's personality )

Fritz the terrier )

It's all Fritz's fault! )

It's not Fritz's fault! )

Miscellanea )
selenak: (James Boswell)
[personal profile] selenak
James Boswell, 18th century diarist, biographer, and tireless celebrity gatecrasher extraordinaire provides us with some terrific glimpses on the German states in 1764, directly after the Seven Years War, starring various Fredericians, which I've collected and am sharing in this post.

First, a note on the source material.

The edition(s) of Boswell's journal I used )

The preface - always useful, prefaces! - also contains information on just how - i.e. by which transport means - Boswell travelled through the German principalities. This is highly useful in case anyone wants to write other 18th century people hitting the road, so, check it out:

Cheap and expensive ways of travelling through the German states )

Amusingly the editors also point out that Boswell by managing to get himself invited a lot in the various towns and residences he visited saved a considerable sum of money for meals. (He also promoted himself to "Baron von Boswell" in order to score all these invites, though not when gatecrashing chez Rousseau and Voltaire.

I tried to order the quotes by subject, starting with George Keith, Lord Marischal, whom Boswell brings to life in a way the various Fritz biographies I've read don't.

George Keith, Lord Marischal: Travelling with Frederick's BFF )

All Things Fritz: of parades and STDS )


Naturally, Boswell visits the British envoy and his father's old pal in Berlin.

Meeting Mr. Mitchell, Envoy Extraordinaire )

Boswell doesn't just meet exiled Scots and German nobility, though. He befriends a couple of families which I had to skip, and also, being a good tourist, checks out more than palaces and parades.

If I ever laugh at Germans, I am a villain! )

With his talent for structuring his life like a novel, Boswell reserved the two most famous celebrities for the last (before moving on to Italy, that is): in Switzerland, he managed to talk his way into not one but several meetings (each) with both Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Voltaire.

Talking about sex with Rousseau )

Boswell did go to Corsica – and wrote a book about the cause of the Corsicans as a result – but went to visit the other greatest philosopher of the age and arch-rival of Rousseau first, to wit, Voltaire. Unlike Rousseau, Voltaire was fluent in English, so most of the transcripts here are in English, and they give a great, vivid impression of what Voltaire was like in his 70s.

He said the King of Prussia wrote like your footboy )

Farewell indeed. While it's a shame Boswell didn't manage an audience with Fritz himself, this hands-down most vivacious of English language diarists of the 18th century provided us with more than enough gems.
mildred_of_midgard: Frederick the Great statue (Frederick)
[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard
There are five Keiths in Fritz's life! [ETA, more have turned up since the initial write-up, but I only recently found them and have very little info on them.] It's very easy to get them confused, and most people have at one point or another. Including published authors. So we start with a who's who.

Straightening out the several Keiths )

For fic research purposes as much as anything, here's pretty much everything I know about Peter Keith. [ETA: see the Eulogy section below, which adds a lot more.]

Peter Keith )

Now, my own thoughts on why Peter felt so neglected when he got back in the 1740s. It's purely speculative, but it's grounded in the little evidence we have.

What went wrong )

Letter from Fritz )

Oh look, it's a much more concise chronology!

Chronology of Peter's life )

The eulogy from the Academy of Sciences, written shortly after Peter's death:

Eulogy )

Trinity College )

Envoy )

Letters

Some letters, evidently between him and Fritz, survive in the Prussian archives. We have not yet gone to the trouble of purchasing a copy, deciphering the handwriting, and figuring out the French, but we might someday!

Knobelsdorff & the Tiergarten )

Residences )

Sons' Residences )

Records: Peter's son's baptism, Peter's wife's burial )

Knyphausen relatives )

1730 Flutes )

Profile

rheinsberg: (Default)
rheinsberg

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 09:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios